Development Characterization and Molecular Simulation studies
of Metoclopramide HCl and Tramadol HCl Bilayer Tablets
Mohammad Habeeb1*, K.L. Deepthi2, M. Vijaya Vara Prasad3, N. Irfan3, Shaik Liakhat Ali4, K. Navyaja5
1Department of Pharmaceutics, Crescent School of Pharmacy, B.S. Abdur Rahman Crescent Institute of Science and Technology, Vandalur, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India.
2Department of Pharmaceutics, Raghu college of Pharmacy, Visakhapatnam, AndhraPradesh, India.
3Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Crescent School of Pharmacy, B.S. Abdur Rahman Crescent Institute of Science and Technology, Vandalur, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India.
4Department of Pharmacology, Vignan Pharmacy college, Vadlamudi,Guntur, Andhra Pradesh. India.
5Department of Pharmacognosy, Institute of Pharmaceutical Technology,
Sri Padmavati Mahila Visvavidyalayam, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India
*Corresponding Author E-mail: mdhabeebqa@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
This work mainly aimed to develop bilayer tablets of drug Metoclopramide HCl and Tramadol HCl with the aid of various polymers such as Guar gum, HPMC, Na CMC and Xanthan gum, either alone or in mixtures. Tablets were ready by instant unleash direct compression and sustained release wet granulation methodology and assessed for numerous physical parameters. The drug unleashes studies were performed exploitation USP equipment sort exploitation zero. 1N HCl and pH scale 6.8 phosphate buffers as dissolution medium. Drug unleash was quicker from Metoclopramide layer and tramadol combination with HPMC, Na CMC, Guargum with Xanthan gum it continuous drug unleash efficiently. The fitting the dissolution approach, initial order, Hixson Crowell and Higuchi, Korsmeyer-Peppas equations were used to analyze the speed and unleash mechanism of Tramadol HCl. Results showed that zero-order unleash Mechanism was followed by F1-F10 formulations. The plots (Higuchi) for all the designs remained rectilinear representing the drug unleash by diffusion controlled. Hixon-Crowell root model showed high r2 price proportion because of hydrophobicity of the gel layer erosion. The discharge configuration, consequences of the in-vitro dissolution information stood fitted to the Korsmeyer-Peppas equation that illustrates the delivery mechanism directs the non fickian transport it confers with a combination of each diffusion and erosion rate delivery. The results concluded that the formulation F10 will improve patient compliance in pain and gastro esophageal reflex and also provides higher wellness management.
KEYWORDS: Metoclopramide, Tramadol HCl, Metoclopramide HCl, Bilayer, Molecular simulation.
INTRODUCTION:
The prim aim of present research is to fabricate the bilayer tablets for sustain release of Metoclopramide HCl and Tramadol HCl using various synthetic and natural polymers. The model of Double-layer tablet (DLT) formulation is exploited to design continuous release and instant release formulation in a single tablet for a single and combination drugs. DLT had higher significance in certain circumstances such as the maintenance of constant drug levels, reduce dose, side effects, intensification to deliver safe and potent drugs to produce better patient compliance.1 A synthetic opioid analgesics Tramadol used to inhibit pain transmission in the spinal cord through the antagonizing of serotonin reuptake in the CNS. Tramadol HCl possesses squat biological half-life (5-7hrs.), due to that patient necessary to take three doses in a day which might be produced dosage missing and accumulation of drug to the patient. To troubleshoot this problem, bilayer Tramadol HCl sustained release dosage forms are designed and evaluated using multiple analyses methodology. Tramadol HCl which is used as an analgesic is formulated as sustain single layer of bilayer tablet. The Metoclopramide HCl coated as first layer intended to reduce stomach and esophageal problems caused by the tramadol. It is generally used to treat emptying of the stomach in people with delayed stomach emptying, nausea, vomiting, and help to reduce gastro esophageal reflex disease.2
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Metoclopramide HCl and Tramadol hydrochloride, obtained from sicho biotech pharma research solutions, Hyderabad, all other excipients purchased from Loba and SD Fine Chemicals Limited, Mumbai.
Estimation of Metoclopramide HCl and Tramadol HCl by UV spectral analysis:
A stock solution of Metoclopramide HCl in 0.1M HCl solutions (100mg in 100mL) was prepared to identify the λmax of tramadol. The Solution 20µg/ml taken from a stock solution of Tramadol was prepared in 6.8 phosphate buffer solution and scanned between 200-400nm for absorption maxima identification.3
Fabrication of immediate release layer:
Direct Compression Method:
The direct compression procedure was applied to form the one layer of Metoclopramide HCl (Table 1). All the excipients include the amalgamation of drug stood sieved through sieve no. 40 to eliminate outsized pellets and blended for 10 min. Consequently, a sufficient amount of the talc intermingled with powder mixture for 5 min and this mixture was directly compressed. The ultimate mass of instant release layer of metoclopramide fixed to 60mg.4
Table 1: Composition of the IR layer of Double-layer tablets prepared by Direct Compression technique
S. No |
Materials |
Composition (mg) |
1 |
Metoclopramide HCl |
30 |
2 |
Sodium starch glycolate |
15 |
3 |
PEG |
9 |
4 |
Talc |
2 |
5 |
Magnesium stearate |
2 |
6 |
Ethyl cellulose |
2 |
7 |
Total weight |
60 |
Fabrication of constant release layer:
Wet Granulation process:
Drug and additional materials stood sifted through sieve no. 40, blended homogenously and granulated with the starch solution (10%) as a granulating vehicle (Table 2). The wet mass remained prepared then passed over and done with sieve no. 12. The granules were air-dried for 10 mins and again passed through sieve no.24 Lubrication through an adequate amount of talc stood done in addition to compressed into tablets. Ethyl cellulose was added between two layers. The final mass of sustained-release layer fixed to 156mg. 2mg of Ethyl cellulose was added between two layers of tablet.5
RESULTS:
Compatibility studies between drug and excipient:
These study emphases on a double mixture of drug material besides particular carefully chosen ingredients in a perpetual ratio. The combination kept in the storage condition of 75% RH at higher temperatures as 40oC, 60% RH at temperatures as 55oC in plugged vials. The consequence of the active drug and added ingredients was resolute using IR spectral analysis. A (Bruker FTIR) spectrophotometer was used for the IR spectrum. The sample was recorded using the standard KBr pellet technique. With a resolution of about 4cm-1, samples were scanned in the area from 4000 to 400 cm-1and it was found is drug is compatible with polymers.6
Preformulation analysis:
Color and nature of ingredients were analyzed by shifted small amount of powder and spread on a white surface and then visually observed. Further the taste and odor. Similarly, the minimum amount of Tramadol HCl stood used to identify the taste.7
Table 2: Composition of continuous delivery of Double layer Tablets manufactured by Wet Granulation technique
S. No |
Formulation |
F1 |
F2 |
F3 |
F4 |
F5 |
F6 |
F7 |
F8 |
F9 |
F10 |
mg |
|||||||||||
1 |
Tramadol HCl |
100 |
|||||||||
2 |
Gum gum |
50 |
- |
- |
- |
25 |
- |
- |
25 |
- |
25 |
3 |
Xanthan gum |
- |
50 |
- |
- |
- |
25 |
- |
- |
25 |
25 |
4 |
HPMC |
- |
- |
50 |
- |
25 |
25 |
25 |
- |
- |
- |
5 |
NACMC |
- |
- |
- |
50 |
- |
- |
25 |
25 |
25 |
- |
6 |
Starch (10%) |
Quantity sufficient |
|||||||||
7 |
Mg stearate |
3 |
|||||||||
8 |
Talc |
3 |
|||||||||
9 |
Total weight |
156 |
Properties of pre-compression blend and in process quality assurance test for bilayer tablet:
Pre-compressional specifications of Double layered tablets such as Bulk density and true density for the present design remained in the assortment of 0.32- 0.39 gm./ml and 0.40 - 0.49gm./ml.12-14 The angle of repose for the formulations was found to be in the range of 24.47o to 32.38o. Compressibility index and Hauser’s ratio stayed in the range of 10.61 to 13.72% and 1.12 to 1.23. specified that granules prepared by the wet granulation process stood free-flowing. The Assessment of Double-layer tablets such as friability, hardness, thickness, weight variation, drug content, time of disintegration remained inside the standard approved IP limits.8
Dissolution Studies of bilayer tablet using In- vitro methods:
The instant metoclopramide release layer of the dissolution (of 900ml of 0.1N HCl solutions) is considered with the help of USP Type-I device by setting at the 75rpm. The solution upholds at the temperature of 37±0.5°C, and with drawn of 5ml of dissolution medium at every 15 min interval carried out to measure the absorbance by UV spectrophotometric technique at 272nm and then the concentration of the Metoclopramide is estimated from the regular calibration curve. The capacity of the dissolution solution stood accustomed to 900ml at every sampling time by interchanging 5ml with the same dissolution medium.21-23 In the dissolution device release of bilayer drug from the tablet was confirmed by the measurements of 10 hr. by the approach of basket-type tablet dissolution device (USP Type-I) having 900 ml of buffer medium. The conservational condition fixed at 37±0.5ºC and 75rpm speed of movement.9
Cumulative percent drug release data for bilayer tablets of instant release:
The In-vitro cumulative percent of drug release for instant release was done by using USP Type-I dissolution apparatus and it was found to be all the formulations release the drug within two hours.10
Cumulative percent drug release for continuous release:
The consequences of in-vitro drug release outline of Double layered tablets illustrates that amalgamations of natural gums performs a significant part in the impedance and optimization of the drug delivery and enhance the delay of drug delivery from the continuous layer of a Double layered tablet.11 Whole preparations stood prepared for instant delivery layer by means of sodium starch glycolate, PEG, Talc; the percentage drug delivery expressions formulations (F1-F10) in the series of 98.102% to 99.897% for F8 and F3 was tabulated in (Table 3).
Invitro drug release kinetics:
The erosion model stood smeared to in vitro delivery records; the linearity stood detected with r value in addition similarly Hixon-Crowell cube root model exhibited great. r2 value of 0.942 to 0.999 was tabulated in (Table 4-5) recommended that the geometrical shape of tablet lessened proportionality due to erosion of the hydrophilic gel layer. To discover the delivery configuration, results of the in-vitro dissolution records stood fitted to the Korsmeyer-Peppas equation, which describes the delivery mechanism. The value of delivery exponent (n) for whole preparations remained in concerning 0.427 to 0.669 directs the non fickian transport or irregular diffusion it refers to an amalgam of jointly diffusion and erosion rate release.12
Table 3: Cumulative percent drug release data for bilayer tablet for Continuous release
S. no |
Time (Hr.) |
F1 G |
F2 X |
F3 H |
F4 N |
F5 (G+H) |
F6 (X+H) |
F7 (H+N) |
F8 (G+N) |
F9 (X+N) |
F10 (G+X) |
1 |
0.5 |
25.34 |
22.11 |
33.969 |
35.476 |
27.874 |
27.75 |
34.571 |
30.589 |
29.865 |
22.11 |
2 |
1 |
33.666 |
24.12 |
41.406 |
46.698 |
35.838 |
35.684 |
40.725 |
36.924 |
38.734 |
24.135 |
3 |
1.5 |
34.571 |
31.356 |
49.647 |
59.006 |
42.354 |
42.532 |
48.689 |
43.078 |
48.508 |
27.135 |
4 |
2 |
46.155 |
40.401 |
60.702 |
75.115 |
51.947 |
49.199 |
53.938 |
46.979 |
52.128 |
33.768 |
5 |
2.5 |
53.576 |
49.446 |
71.556 |
86.88 |
59.549 |
56.227 |
59.549 |
51.766 |
58.101 |
41.808 |
6 |
3 |
59.73 |
57.285 |
80.802 |
95.568 |
69.142 |
57.669 |
67.513 |
59.766 |
62.264 |
47.258 |
7 |
3.5 |
69.142 |
63.114 |
88.641 |
97.016 |
76.02 |
64.156 |
73.486 |
68.599 |
68.056 |
51.225 |
8 |
4 |
77.106 |
76.179 |
91.656 |
99.369 |
80.907 |
68.120 |
81.812 |
77.468 |
72.038 |
53.265 |
9 |
4.5 |
86.518 |
82.209 |
96.279 |
|
85.251 |
70.102 |
86.699 |
83.079 |
74.029 |
59.898 |
10 |
5 |
93.396 |
85.626 |
99.897 |
|
87.321 |
72.445 |
94.301 |
86.699 |
79.278 |
66.933 |
11 |
5.5 |
95.93 |
93.063 |
|
|
89.957 |
76.049 |
97.921 |
89.957 |
82.536 |
70.725 |
12 |
6 |
99.188 |
95.676 |
|
|
95.749 |
81.815 |
98.645 |
93.034 |
87.423 |
75.174 |
13 |
6.5 |
|
97.083 |
|
|
97.921 |
84.879 |
|
95.568 |
90.138 |
78.792 |
14 |
7 |
|
99.095 |
|
|
98.826 |
89.744 |
|
98.102 |
91.948 |
82.611 |
15 |
7.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
92.627 |
|
|
93.396 |
85.827 |
16 |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
95.330 |
|
|
95.568 |
89.455 |
17 |
8.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
98.295 |
|
|
97.921 |
93.465 |
18 |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
99.295 |
|
|
99.331 |
96.078 |
19 |
9.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98.289 |
20 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99.596 |
Table 4: In-vitro Drug Release Kinetics for Bilayer Tablets R2 Values.
S. No |
Formu lation |
Zero-order (R)2 |
First-order (R)2 |
Higuchi (R)2 |
Peppas (R)2 |
Hixson crowel (R)2 |
1 |
F1 |
0988 |
0.831 |
0.969 |
0.671 |
0.942 |
2 |
F2 |
0.971 |
0.898 |
0.975 |
0.735 |
0.986 |
3 |
F3 |
0.971 |
0.732 |
0.985 |
0.479 |
0.965 |
4 |
F4 |
0.940 |
0.932 |
0.973 |
0.451 |
0.989 |
5 |
F5 |
0.951 |
0.431 |
0.987 |
0.508 |
0.986 |
6 |
F6 |
0.977 |
0.830 |
0.996 |
0.500 |
0.954 |
7 |
F7 |
0.991 |
0.866 |
0.981 |
0.481 |
0.965 |
8 |
F8 |
0.975 |
0.924 |
0.976 |
0.813 |
0.985 |
9 |
F9 |
0.960 |
0.940 |
0.996 |
0.785 |
0.990 |
10 |
F10 |
0.985 |
0.807 |
0.985 |
0.635 |
0.961 |
Table 5: In-vitro Drug Release Kinetics for Bilayer Tablets.
S. no |
Formulation |
Zero-order |
First-order |
Higuchi
|
Peppas
|
Hixoncrowel
|
|||
Slope (k) |
Slope |
(k) |
Slope (k) |
Slope (n) |
(k) |
Slope |
(k) |
||
1 |
F1 |
14.8 |
-0.280 |
0.6650 |
42.60 |
0.600 |
32.1025 |
0.563 |
0.1213 |
2 |
F2 |
13.5 |
-0.268 |
0.7000 |
42.01 |
0.669 |
27.9254 |
0.521 |
0.1122 |
3 |
F3 |
19.52 |
-0.399 |
1.0061 |
46.09 |
0.512 |
44.2588 |
-0.727 |
0.1566 |
4 |
F4 |
24.00 |
-0.500 |
1.1988 |
52.96 |
0.540 |
49.773 |
-0.939 |
0.2023 |
5 |
F5 |
13.55 |
-0.260 |
0.5622 |
39.13 |
0.520 |
37.4110 |
-0.481 |
0.1036 |
6 |
F6 |
9.12 |
-0.195 |
0.6522 |
32.54 |
0.454 |
36.2242 |
-0.353 |
0.07605 |
7 |
F7 |
9.550 |
-0.180 |
0.3999 |
33.81 |
0.584 |
25.6448 |
-0.343 |
0.0739 |
8 |
F8 |
12.89 |
-0.200 |
0.5000 |
38.134 |
0.491 |
37.4196 |
-0.447 |
0.0963 |
9 |
F9 |
9.66 |
-0.199 |
0.4563 |
32.49 |
0.427 |
39.6278 |
-0.364 |
0.0784 |
10 |
F10 |
9.258 |
-0.650 |
0.4125 |
34.55 |
0.600 |
24.9999 |
-0.355 |
0.0258 |
Molecular simulations studies:
Software:
To study the adsorption between the tramadol and various polymers Materials Studio platform (DEMO) used which predict and understand the relationships of a material’s atomic level interaction energies with its properties and behavior.13
Blends
The binding energy was measured to find the energy interaction between the polymer and tramadol. In this study initially, COMPASS II force field was applied and geometrically optimized the coordinates of the components. Further, tramadol used as a base and four different polymers used as a screen to analyses the compatibility energy.14
Adsorption Locator:
This adsorption Locator module simulates a substrate loaded with tramadol in a fixed composition. It finds low energy adsorption sites of the polymer where tramadol binds with higher stability to make a stable composition. Monte Carlo searches identify the possible adsorption configurations in the chemical space of the substrate-adsorbate system rendering to a simulated annealing protocol was represented in (Table 6) and (Fig. 1-2)15
Table 6: Blends binding energies between tramadol and Polymers
Energies |
Ebb avg (298 K) |
Ebs avg (298 K) |
Ess avg (298 K) |
Tremadol_ Xanthan |
-4.7963 |
-5.93538 |
-9.14678 |
Tremadol_HPMC |
-4.7963 |
-20.0316 |
-25.6125 |
Tremadol_Guar Gum |
-4.7963 |
-2.9821 |
-1.93962 |
Tremadol_CMC |
-4.7963 |
-22.3303 |
-115.399 |
Fig. 1: Adsoption location and the binding energy graph of tramadol and xanthone polymer.
Fig. 2: Adsoption location and the binding energy graph of tramadol and Guar Gum polymer.
DISCUSSION:
Tramadol HCL shows virtuous straightly indicative of choice of UV-spectrophotometry system for assessment of tramadol is accurate.16-20 The resulting limits of Double layered tablets stood within standard authorized IP limits Pre-compressional specifications of Double layered tablets such as Bulk density and true density for the present design remained in the assortment of 0.32- 0.39 gm. /ml and 0.40 - 0.49gm./ml. The angle of repose for the formulations was found to be in the range of 24.47o to 32.38o. Compressibility index and Hauser’s ratio stayed in the range of 10.61 to 13.72% and 1.12 to 1.23. specified that granules prepared by the wet granulation process stood free-flowing. The Assessment of Double-layer tablets such as friability, hardness, thickness, weight variation, drug content, time of disintegration remained inside the standard approved IP limits.21-23 The Grade A Design of Double-layer tablets stood selected for FTIR process did not display any interaction amongst the Gums and pure drug. The degree and process of delivery of Tramadol HCL from the processed double-layered tablets stood estimated by decent the dissolution data into the zero-order, First order, Higuchi, Korsmeyer-Peppas and Hixson Crowell equations. Entirely the Preparations (F1-F10) show the Zero-order release process. Higuchi plots for entire preparations straight representing the drug delivery by diffusion controlled.24-26 Next layer is a continuous delivery layer to sustain stable state concentrations of drug in the systemic circulation. The present investigation is to Design and evaluates a perfect double layer matrix tablet of the continuous delivery outline by using appropriate systems by means of improved synthetic and natural gums.27-28 The erosion model stood smeared to in vitro delivery records, the linearity stood detected with r value in addition similarly Hixon-Crowell cube root model exhibited great r2 value of 0.942 to 0.999 (Table. 4) recommended that the geometrical shape of tablet lessened proportionality due to erosion of the hydrophilic gel layer. To discover the delivery configuration, results of the in-vitro dissolution records stood fitted to the Korsmeyer-Peppas equation, which describes the delivery mechanism. The value of delivery exponent (n) for whole preparations remained in concerning 0.427 to 0.669 directs the non fickian transport or irregular diffusion it refers to an amalgam of jointly diffusion and erosion rate release (Table. 5).29-30 Blends binding energy results showed that the tramadol mixed with the polymers in the order of Xanthan> Guar gum> HPMC> CMC. The binding energies for the three components in the simulated boundary such as base-base (Ebb), base-screen (Ebs), and screen-screen (Ess) combinations found equal distributions which indicate the polymers are well compatible with the drug in the above order. The charts, shown below, indicate that Xanthan and tramadol bind well and the energy distribution (Table 6) is good. Also, the adsorption locator module result showed that the Xanthan possible to absorb the tramadol in two sites (Fig. 1 and 2) with the low energies which make the stable combination and longtime release compare to other mixtures.31The fragment pyran and the aliphatic oxygen formed the interaction with the aliphatic hydrogen and N-CH3 atoms of Xanthan gum (Fig. 1). Guar Gum formed the two hydrophobic interactions with the rings of tramadol (Fig.2). Other two polymers not formed proper orientation with the tramadol which leads to the faster release compare to the xanthane and guar gum. 32
CONCLUSION:
The present research stood conceded out to progress bilayer Continuous deliver tablets of Metoclopramide Hydrochloride Instant deliver layer by direct compression method which is use full for the management of Gastro reflex diseases and Tramadol HCl hydrophilic polymers for sustain release layer by wet granulation process. Established that, double-layer tablet processes can remain effectively smeared for Tramadol HCl by means of gums like HPMC K 100, NACMC, Xanthan gum, Guar gum can be utilized as rate monitoring natural Gums by an applicable assortment of the capacity of natural gums in the matrix tablets. Molecular simulation studies the adsorption locator module result showed that the Xanthan possible to adsorbs the tramadol in two sites with the low energies which make the stable combination and longtime release compare to other mixtures. Finally, this research found to be optimized batch F10 by bilayer drug delivery design and provide healthier disease in pain and gastritis management and also provides patient compliance.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST:
The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the manuscript.
REFERENCES:
1. Soham Shukla, Vikram Pandya, Praful Bhardia, Nitin Jonwal, Deepak Bhatt. Bi-layer Tablet system – An Innovative trend. Asian J. Pharm. Res. 3(2): April- June 2013; Page 49-56.
2. Bijay Kumar Sahoo, Sidheswar Prasad Pattajoshi, Sandhyarani Pattajoshi. Formulation and Evaluation of Bimolar Release of Ciprofloxacin HCl from Bilayer Gastro-Retentive Floating System. Asian J. Pharm. Res. 2018; 8(2): 61-70.
3. G. Vasavi, P. Naga Haritha, B. Chandrashekar. Formulation Development and In vitro Evaluation of Transdermal Patches of Tramadol HCl. Asian J. Res. Pharm. Sci. 2018; 8(3):123-129.
4. P. Purushothaman, A. Umar Faruk Sha, T. Vetrichelvan. Formulation development and Evaluation of immediate and sustained release Bilayer Tablets Containing Amitriptyline HCl and Pregabalin for the treatment of Neuropathic Pain. Asian J. Pharm. Tech. 2017; 7 (3): 127-136.
5. Beedha. Saraswathi, Dr. T. Satyanarayana, K. Mounika, G. Swathi, K. Sravika, M. Mohan Krishna. Formulation and Characterization of Tramadol HCl Transdermal Patch. Asian J. Pharm. Tech. 2018; 8 (1):23-28.
6. Rajesh Shukla, R. Sivakumar, P.R. Vijayanand, P. Kumar Nallasivan, R. Venkatnarayanan. RP-HPLC Method for Simultaneous Estimation of Tramadol HCl and Paracetamol Bulk Drug and Its Combined Dosage Form. Asian J. Research Chem. 3(3): July- Sept. 2010; Page 552-554.
7. Aruna R., Venkateswara Rao T. Design and Development of Bilayer Floating Tablets of Diltiazem Hydrochloride. Research J. Pharma. Dosage Forms and Tech. 2011; 3(6): 304-309.
8. Salma Banu S.K., Venkateswara Rao T. Design and Development of Sustained Release Bilayered Tablets of Glipizide. Research J. Pharma. Dosage Forms and Tech. 2012; 4(1):24-31.
9. Ankarao, CH. Babu Rao, N. Devanna. Formulation and Evaluation of Buccoadhesive Bilayered Tablets of Terbutaline Sulphate. Research J. Pharma. Dosage Forms and Tech. 2012; 4(1):32-35.
10. Soham Shukla, Vikram Pandya, Praful Bhardia, Nitin Jonwal, Shashank Mishra, Deepak Bhatt, Deependra Jain. Formulation and In vitro Evaluation of Immediate Release Bilayer Tablets of Telmisartan and Amlodipine Besylate. Research J. Pharma. Dosage Forms and Tech. 2013; 5(2): 79-87.
11. Nishanth I., Elango K., Deattu N., Stephen P. Formulation Development and Evaluation of Bilayer Tablets of Telmisartan for Immediate Release and Metformin Hydrochloride for Sustained Release. Research J. Pharma. Dosage Forms and Tech. 2013; 5(3): 139-144.
12. Mukund G Tawar , Pawar M D, P D Chaudhari. Development and Evaluation of Tramadol Hydrochloride Sustained Release Tablet. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2 (3): July-Sept. 2009; Page 470-473.
13. R.Z. Mujoriya, Venkateshvarlu, D.C. Singh, V.A. Gupta, A Bisen, A.B. Bondre. Formulation Development and Evaluation of Metoprolol Succinate ER and Amlodipine Besilate Bilayer Tablet. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 3 (4): Oct.-Dec.2010; Page 1291-1294.
14. Reddy KR, Mutalik S, Reddy S. Once-daily sustained-release matrix tablets of nicorandil: formulation and in vitro evaluation. AAPS Pharm SciTech. 2003; 4: 1-9.
15. Shiyani B, Gattani S, Surana S. Formulation and evaluation of bilayer tablet of metoclopramide hydrochloride and ibuprofen. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech. 9: 818-827.
16. Pranjal Kumar S, Sanjoo Kumar D, VK Shukla, Guru Sharan P, Pankaj Verma K, and Samiran D. Bilayer and Floating-Bioadhesive tablets: Innovative approach to Gastro retention. Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics. 2011; 1(1): 32-35.
17. Hiten Ashok P, Ajay Kumar T. A Novel approach of Bilayer Tablet technology: A Review. International Research Journal of Pharmacy. 2012; 5-10.
18. Manidipta D. Bilayer Tableting Technology: An Overview. Journal of Pharmacy Research. 2012; 25(1): 310-314.
19. Mohit Solakhia T, Ashish Kumar K, Dr.Shikha Agrawal D, and Dishant G. Bi-Layer Tablets: An Emerging Trend. International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biological Archives. 2012; 3(3): 499-506.
20. Shivakumar HN, Nath BS, Desai BG. Effect of added HPMC and HEC on the release of cetostearyl alcohol embedded diclofenac sodium from tables for controlled release. The Eastern Pharmacist. 2001: 117-9.
21. Hosseinali T, Seyed AM, Tina BG. Preparation of sustained release matrix tablets of aspirin with ethylcellulose, Eudragit RS100 and eudragit S100 and studying the release profile and their sensitivity to Tablets hardness. Iranian Journal of Pharm Research. 2003: 201-06.
22. Kale VV, Kaslival RH, Avari JG. Effect of matrix geometry on drug release from guar gum matrix Tablets. Indian Drugs. 2005; 42: 84-6.
23. Haider SS, Monnujan N, Shahriyar SM. Sustained release preparation of metoclopramide hydrochloride based on fatty matrix. Indian Drugs. 2002; 39:73-9.
24. C. Pessina. Metabolic effects and safety profile of nebivolol. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology. Vol. 38, 2002; no. 3, pp. S33– S35,
25. J. R. Patel, B. A. Patel, D. G. Patel, D. S. Patel, and V. B. Patel. Formulation and evaluation of oral controlled drug delivery system for a model anti diabetic drug metformin. International Journal of Current Pharmaceutical Research. Vol. 3, 2011; pp. 37–39,
26. M. Rangapriya, V. Manigandan, R. Natarajan, and K. Mohan Kumar. Formulation and evaluation of floating tablets of Pioglitazone hydrochloride. International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Chemical Sciences. Vol. 1, 2012; pp. 1048–1054,
27. V. Thanda, S. Firoz, C. Yerram, A. Vikram, S. K. Divya, and K. T. Murali. Design and characterization sustained release matrix tablets of Repaglinide using natural polymers. International Journal of Pharmacy. Vol. 2, 2012; pp. 73–83,
28. D. Vamshi, P. Laxmi Madhuri, and G. Tuljarani. Method development and validation of indapamide and nebivolol hydrochloride by rp-HPLC method. International Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical and Nano Sciences. Vol. 2, 2013; No. 6, pp. 798–810,
29. G. H. Kumar, K. Jaganathan, R. S. Kumar, and P. Peruma. Formulation and in-vitro evaluation of bilayer floating tablets of Metformin hydrochloride and Sitagliptin phosphate. International Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutics. Vol. 2, 2012; no. 2, pp. 64–81,
30. D. Rohini, S. Alexandar, and M. J. N. Chandrasekar. Preparation and in vitro evaluation of sustained release tablet formulations of metformin HCl. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research. Vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 2012; 45–48,
31. K. Venkateswarlu and A. Shanthi. Formulation and evaluation of sustained release glipizide matrix,. IOSR Journal of Pharmacy and Biological Sciences (IOSRJPBS), Vol. 2, 2012; no. 5, pp. 17–23,
32. P. Shirse. Formulation and evaluation of bilayered tablets of HP-𝛽-cyclodextrin complex glimepiride with metformin hydrochloride for immediate and sustain release. International Journal of Pharmacy and Biological Sciences, Vol. 3, 2012; no. 3, pp. 148–160,
Received on 08.10.2020 Modified on 26.02.2021
Accepted on 01.04.2021 © RJPT All right reserved
Research J. Pharm.and Tech 2022; 15(2):529-534.
DOI: 10.52711/0974-360X.2022.00085